Feminist Disney
(Part 1 of 2) I want to thank you. Up until about a year ago, all I knew about feminism I had learned while growing up listening to republican talk radio. I thought "women are already equal" and anyone who companied about this "rape culture" stuff was just and "being an attention whore." Then, I found your blog.

(Part 2 of 2) You were my intro to feminism. I couldn’t see the big issues because I’d been brainwashed into thinking they didn’t exist, but you helped me see the “tiny” problems that existed in the movies I grew up with. You also helped me see how big those tiny problem become when in the real world. So, thank you again. I became a feminist because of your blog. And best of all, so did my Mom. (end ask)

———

Aw, thank you for sharing that with me! It is always nice to hear that this blog can help people reconsider things like that. I am glad to be on this journey with you (and your mom), and everyone else who follows & provides constant feedback on different issues. :)

xelamanrique:

starksnark:

snowwhiteseviltwin:

stickersthesuccubus:

feministdisney:

flopehoats:

elizabitchtaylor:

gbg-g:

interstellargeek:

feministdisney:

xelamanrique:

look who’s finally joined!

look who got pushed to the side

Wow, move Tiana over one and suddenly all the PoC princesses are in the very back. I mean, did the people that made this lineup not see how racist this appears?

Mhmm. So not surprised

ew i hate the redesign and also why would you put Mulan in the outfit she wore to see the matchmaker, which she hated because it didn’t really represent her?

GOD DAMMIT MULAN IS NOT A PRINCESS SHE MARRIED A GENERAL

I like how someone read all this and at the end of it all was truly outraged that…

Mulan is in the lineup

I love how all of them were gussied up an glitz’d and glamour’d EXCEPT Pocahontas.
Like she looks like she was thrown in as an afterthought.

They actually redesigned her, but people got pissed off that she was redesigned.

Y’all are shitty. You want change and then when it’s given, you all rage.

Just stop.

And guess what? The ones in the center are the most popular - they’re put there because they’re the ones most likely to get attention. Why would they put someone less popular in the front? There’s a reason the frontman of a band is usually in the front in pictures - they’re the ones most easily recognized. It’s simple marketing.

you know what i don’t understand? the fact that you guys are complaining about a bunch of FUCKING CARTOONS! get the fuck off my post!

“it’s simple marketing” says the person who comes to the conversation 500 years late. Please, try to convince me that Mulan is not a fan favorite, I’m waiting.

And you know what? If a company consistently markets white princesses as central to the brand- and they ALWAYS do, either just throwing in one WoC princess or 0 for smaller group merchandising, then yeah, people will associate the front princesses more with being princesses. Go back to marketing 101, you have a hand in creating the market for your product.

Also like, what is that logic even? Like the marketing of the entire line up would be off, they would lose money, just by putting Tiana and Jasmine- who are both also pretty popular princesses actually- up closer to the front?? Really. You won’t even be able to find stats for who the most popular princesses are- you’re just assuming it couldn’t be the women of color. I disagree. Although I can only find not super official stats, they do indicate that Jasmine and Mulan are favorites of the fandom. 

Also lol at this last guy- when I reblogged it from you it had like 10 posts, and it’s not like you drew the thing yourself. Go back to the library and pick up a psych book on child development so that you can figure out why cartoons are not immune from critique

Do you know of any video game feminist blogs?

people can comment if they know of any…

I really just don’t care enough about video games to the point where I do not keep track of anything other than the basic knowledge points. To actually know if a blog is good requires reading it so I won’t go recommending blogs I’ve seen all of three posts from :P

also i think in the past, if you use “has this been asked before?” people have submitted the titles of their video game feminist blogs and stuff for people to check out

just a reminder to *comment* w/your blog or blog you like if you want to share, I don’t feel like publishing 20 asks about video game blogs :p

Female portrayal in video games often leaves them in very skimpy clothing or spinebreaking "action" shots. I would be interested in learning your thoughts on the skimpy clothing part though. I am all for anti-slutshaming and desexualization of body parts (the dresscode talk has really interested me!); but these fictional girls are considered sexualized because of these outfits. Since skimpy outfits are coded/widely accepted as sexual/"slutty" these characters are sexualized? To elaborate, (1)

(2) these characters are not sentient (they do not the decision to wear the clothing) and it is instead an artist/group of designers who KNOW that the clothing is considered sexual/”slutty” & it is a blatant attempt to sexualize them (is this right?). I hope I’m making myself clear. I’m just curious if you have any thoughts on this kind of thing, as I spend a lot of time discussing it. :D (end ask)

——

yeah I think you answered your own… statement there haha in that it’s because they’re not sentient/choosing what they wear.

It’s not like a problem for clothing of all lengths to be options. It’s a problem when the player is only presented, over and over, with a very limited range of body types/sizes & clothing options for female characters. And specifically female characters- male characters get a wide range of body sizes and clothing options, and are not coded in sexualized ways. It becomes clear that men are there to be characters, while women are there partially to be eye candy for players.

And sexualized coding is more than just clothing, but the way they pose for games or advertising as well- female characters are often given passive, suggestive stances while male figures are given active stances etc. Or logistically- armor for men covers up vital organs, while armor for women covers up just their nipples.

Gender differentiation in character illustration is also why the infamous “boobs and butt” stance is so ubiquitous that we sometimes need to remind people it’s actually happening and very weird to look at, yet male characters have this down so infrequently or never that simply switching the poses (so that a male character is showing “boobs and butt” parts of body in a single frame) is enough to get people’s attention and make a point without even adding any commentary.

I’ll add to the bottom of this though that I’m definitely not a video game player, I’m just evaluating the images/repeating what I have learned through cultural dialogue about this issue. ;)

flopehoats:

elizabitchtaylor:

gbg-g:

interstellargeek:

feministdisney:

xelamanrique:

look who’s finally joined!

look who got pushed to the side

Wow, move Tiana over one and suddenly all the PoC princesses are in the very back. I mean, did the people that made this lineup not see how racist this appears?

Mhmm. So not surprised

ew i hate the redesign and also why would you put Mulan in the outfit she wore to see the matchmaker, which she hated because it didn’t really represent her?

GOD DAMMIT MULAN IS NOT A PRINCESS SHE MARRIED A GENERAL

I like how someone read all this and at the end of it all was truly outraged that…

Mulan is in the lineup

xelamanrique:

look who’s finally joined!

look who got pushed to the side

ave-atque-vale:

faineemae:

Many people have already found my feature in Seventeen Magazine, so I am really excited to finally talk about this after hiding it for two months!As of May 20th, I am the first Hijabi to be featured in Seventeen magazine. I’m really humbled and honored to announced that I’m working with Gucci, Beyonce for her campaign, Chime for Change and Seventeen Magazine to unite and strengthen the voices speaking out for girls and women around the world. 

I would like to thank everyone who has constantly shown support, but more importantly thank God for all the opportunities, people and happiness He has bestowed upon me. Without Him, I wouldn’t be where I am today because He was able to help me become a better poet with my second family, my poetry slam team and my wonderful coach who helped me find my voice and believing in me. Thank you to my parents and siblings, as well as my friends for supporting me in everything I do. Thank you to Kevin Coval for Louder Than a Bomb, because if I had never competed, I wouldn’t be where I am today. Alhumdulillah, I really thank God for helping me by letting others see the best in me and hiding my flaws.

The issue is in stores all over the world, on itunes, amazon and kindle. Please make sure to buy a copy to show your support, it would mean so much! If you are unable to buy the magazine, here is a high-res scan of this article. There are videos of my poetry on youtube, you can search by typing in “ainee fatima” 
I will be posting a video of my trip and photoshoot in a couple of days, make sure you look out for it. Thank you again to everyone for supporting me in everything I do, I wouldn’t be here without your support.

congratulations, darling!

very awesome, Ainee :) & good work to seventeen for covering stories like this.

ave-atque-vale:

faineemae:

Many people have already found my feature in Seventeen Magazine, so I am really excited to finally talk about this after hiding it for two months!

As of May 20th, I am the first Hijabi to be featured in Seventeen magazine. I’m really humbled and honored to announced that I’m working with Gucci, Beyonce for her campaign, Chime for Change and Seventeen Magazine to unite and strengthen the voices speaking out for girls and women around the world. 

I would like to thank everyone who has constantly shown support, but more importantly thank God for all the opportunities, people and happiness He has bestowed upon me. Without Him, I wouldn’t be where I am today because He was able to help me become a better poet with my second family, my poetry slam team and my wonderful coach who helped me find my voice and believing in me. Thank you to my parents and siblings, as well as my friends for supporting me in everything I do. Thank you to Kevin Coval for Louder Than a Bomb, because if I had never competed, I wouldn’t be where I am today. Alhumdulillah, I really thank God for helping me by letting others see the best in me and hiding my flaws.

The issue is in stores all over the world, on itunes, amazon and kindle. Please make sure to buy a copy to show your support, it would mean so much! If you are unable to buy the magazine, here is a high-res scan of this article. There are videos of my poetry on youtube, you can search by typing in “ainee fatima” 

I will be posting a video of my trip and photoshoot in a couple of days, make sure you look out for it. Thank you again to everyone for supporting me in everything I do, I wouldn’t be here without your support.

congratulations, darling!

very awesome, Ainee :) & good work to seventeen for covering stories like this.

Not a follower, and haven't seen much of the blog, but I wanted to express some extreme thanks for the post about PoC in Paris, as it's helped immensely to reinforce my arguments against people who claim that Norm Lewis' portrayal of Javert (my personal favorite) was "Historically Impossible". :D

took me a minute to remember what you were talking about! (post refers to why PoC would not be historically inaccurate, and why they would not have to “only” be slaves, for B&theB)

I’m glad you found it helpful :)

I keep finding it funny that, at my university, the head of social justice and feminism and those things is actually a Doctor Disney. Are the two of you related?

haha I think I might have actually heard of this individual before by another of their students, but no, I am not related (as far as I know)

Your name is very controversial ;)

yours too, inventing canadian disney princesses… ;)

fdunlimited:

late85:

إن كان للحب تعريف فهو بقلوب -امھاتنا 

so cute that I’m dying

nothing Disney just…cute

fdunlimited:

late85:

إن كان للحب تعريف فهو بقلوب -امھاتنا

so cute that I’m dying

nothing Disney just…cute

Who Does this Merchandise at Target Look Like?

from Jezebel:

image

The correct answer is: It’s Brave’s Merida. The more correct answer: It could be any of the white ones (so… almost all of them?) with a wavy — it’s not even curly! Jesus! — red wig on. Ugh!

Sold via Target as part of the “Ultimate Disney Princess” collection, this Merida is completely unrecognizable as anything other than a conservatively dressed Barbie with a weird belt on. I know these are generic dolls that the manufacturers make minimal alterations to and sell them as Disney princesses, but I suppose that’s part of the problem, right? One of the great things about Merida is her unique, unapologetic looks, and that’s something the public obviously feels passionately about. These ridiculously skinny, impossibly tiny-featured, giant-eyed weirdos don’t represent a spectrum of real women for little girls to aspire to. It’s fucking irresponsible, and annoying as all get out.

May I ask your opinion on something? Today I saw a homeless man while I was walking down the street, and he was shivering with cold (it's autumn in my country and today was rainy and windy). I felt as if I needle had pierced my heart and entered the first clothes shop I saw, and bought a coat. When I came back unfortunately he was gone. But it made me think: would it be offensive to give him the coat? Would I be playing the "white savior" role? (continues)

(continuation) He was shivering, but technically he wasn’t asking for help. I wonder if, had I managed to give him the coat, it would have been something bad instead of the usual good people may think? Thanks. (end ask)

——-

ok… going to assume you’re white and he was a PoC, otherwise I hope I don’t have to explain that there’s no way it could be white savior-y.

But anyway, I answered with an explanation of what white savior v. helping people is several asks ago, but to be brief, white savior is an attitude about actions, not so much the actions themselves, although they are linked since attitude guides which action you take.

But no, it is not offensive to offer a homeless man a coat (bolding to remind that homeless people can choose, if they want, not to accept charity for various reasons).

White savior complex usually occurs with a lot more people than one, and involves assumptions not based in the present moment. Like wanting to go to Africa to save the African people from themselves. It’s something that is happening because of assumptions about race, intelligence, and agency etc., rather than in spite of it. Sometimes it’s just assuming that your white charity is good, without examining the consequences. There is a movement here, that I’ve had friends participate in, where people turn pillowcases into dresses for young girls. Helpful in a very basic way, but it actually wreaks havoc on local communities that receive this “aid” in Africa, because they cannot compete with their own wares and good when people can receive them as foreign aid for free. So when you think about it, that’s a very well established organization, yet everyone was so assured that their charity was “helpful” they never paused to think that maybe the problem is more complex and not easy to solve by a few never-been-there outsiders.

It’s also the attitude people take afterward- like the Disney intern last week who thought her efforts to help africans get bushmeat, or whatever, could cancel out unrelated critique of her ideas about the Disney princesses. It’s like… seeing yourself as almost holy for helping african people, even though half the time people are using these charity events to further their career/education/whatever anyway (not in a mean way, but it’s not like they aren’t using the situation).

An example of white savior complex operating as a plotline is the disney movie Atlantis- see review for more details. 

White savior complex is assuming you know the answer better than anyone else… and a bunch of other stuff. I think if you go back a couple pages, there was also a full reblog of explanation, so I don’t want to get into it too much more since there are a lot of places to read up upon it. I would really rather you find more sources because my response could be better, and I’m not going to be around later today to post anything people send me, if they do.

but tl;dr it’s important to understand what it is so that we don’t fall into it, because “being white, while giving charity” is not equivalent to “white savior complex.”

but wouldn’t using plus size people be the same as using homeless people? I’d just say don’t buy the clothes and send that money instead to charities that help people working in sweatshops, because they’ll get hurt too by all of this

no… the agency is different. This would obviously only happen if plus sized, fat, whatever women felt absolutely comfortable doing it. They’d be deciding to find/redo the shirts, wearing it to the place. They would understand exactly what would happen with their image and they have total choice to participate. And I mean, idk if it’s the greatest idea, but it’s definitely different from what the video did.

Again, the charity was coercive because destitute people only were given charity (clothing) if they agreed to front for this cause (getting back at abercrombie) for a video they did not really understand the implications of (using them as a gimmick for his own look-at-me ish, when the above would be centered by the women, organized by them, not a distant lens aimed at them and using them, so much). 

also to be clear, I’m not saying to buy their clothes directly, ever. Which is why I said if you have it in your closet, or get it from goodwill. I don’t feel particularly like doing anything to Abercrombie because I’d rather they just stick to their troubled ways and die as a business, but, they asked what I would recommend. B

Hey, can I ask your opinion on something? Yesterday a guy I know said something on FB akin to "Angelina Jolie's boobies are gone sad face" and I called him out on it. After a few other responses, a woman I know chimed in with "Well, I'm a woman and I thought it was funny." What would you say to another woman who says something like this? I feel like he'll only ever remember her comment and think, "Well, one woman said it was okay, so it is." Your thoughts? (I know it's not Disney, sorry.)

It’s a really non-reason unless there’s a rule that says all women must think with a hive mind, and things are only sexist offensive to women if all women agree that they are?

That doesn’t even make sense. Nothing in the entire world would be offensive or wrong if you always had to get an entire group of thousands, millions or billions of people to agree it is. You can always find that one person who is either blithely uninformed, or looking for a pat on the head from the oppressor